• October 23, 2018, 01:09:41 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Advanced search  

News:

Author Topic: I just though this was funny!  (Read 4098 times)

Flash

  • Administrator
  • Blue Gene Super Computer
  • **********
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13176
I just though this was funny!
« on: November 26, 2008, 09:51:50 PM »

For some time many of us have wondered just who is Jack Schitt?

We find ourselves at a loss when someone says, 'You don't know Jack Schitt!'

Well, thanks to genealogy, you can now respond in an intellectual way.

Jack Schitt is the only son of Awe Schitt. Awe Schitt was married to O.. Schitt, the fertilizer magnate, and owner of Needeep N. Schitt, Inc. They had one son, Jack. In turn, Jack Schitt married Noe Schitt. The deeply religious couple produced six children: Holie Schitt, Giva Schitt, FullaSchitt, Bull Schitt, and the twins Deep Schitt and Dip Schitt. Against her parents' objections, Deep Schitt married Dumb Schitt, a high school dropout. After being married 15 years, Jack and Noe Schitt divorced.Noe Schitt later married Ted Sherlock, and because her kids were living with them, she wanted to keep her previous name. She was then known as Noe Schitt-Sherlock. Meanwhile, Dip Schitt married Loda Schitt, and they produced a son with a rather nervous disposition who was nick-named Chicken Schitt. Two of the other six children, Fulla Schitt and Giva Schitt, were inseparable throughout childhood and subsequently married the Happens brothers in a dual ceremony. The wedding announcement in the newspaper announced the Schitt-Happens nuptials. The Schitt-Happens children were Dawg, Byrd, and Horse. Bull Schitt, the prodigal son, left home to tour the world. He recently returned from Italy with his new Italian bride, Pisa Schitt.
Now when someone says, 'You don't know Jack Schitt,' you can correct them.
Sincerely,
Crock O. Schitt
Logged
Coding for the love of it!

Flash

  • Administrator
  • Blue Gene Super Computer
  • **********
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13176
Re: I just though this was funny!
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2008, 09:53:11 PM »

One for HK,

There was an engineer, manager and programmer driving down a steep mountain road.
The brakes failed and the car careened down the road out of control.

Half way down the driver managed to stop the car by running it against the embankment narrowing avoiding going over a cliff.

They all got out, shaken by their narrow escape from death, but otherwise unharmed.

The manager said "To fix this problem we need to organize a committee, have meetings, and through a process of continuous improvement, develop a solution."

The engineer said "No that would take too long, and besides that method never worked before. I have my trusty pen knife here and will take apart the brake system, isolate the problem and correct it."

The programmer said "I think you're both wrong! I think we should all push the car back up the hill and see if it happens again."
Logged
Coding for the love of it!

Flash

  • Administrator
  • Blue Gene Super Computer
  • **********
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13176
Re: I just though this was funny!
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2008, 09:57:39 PM »

Wife 1.0
Last year a friend of mine upgraded GirlFriend 1.0 to Wife 1.0 and found that it's a memory hog leaving very little system resources for other applications. He is only now noticing that Wife 1.0 also is spawning Child-Processes which are further consuming valuable resources. No mention of this particular phenomena was included in the product brochure or the documentation, though other users have informed him that this is to be expected due to the nature of the application. Not only that, Wife 1.0 installs itself such that it is always launched at system initialization where it can monitor all other system activity. He's finding that some applications such as PokerNight 10.3, BeerBash 2.5, and PubNight 7.0 are no longer able to run in the system at all, crashing the system when selected (even though they always worked fine before).
At installation, Wife 1.0 provides no option as to the installation of undesired Plug-Ins such as MotherInLaw 55.8 and BrotherInLaw Beta release. Also, system performance seems to diminish with each passing day.

The features he'd like to see in the upcoming Wife 2.0 include:

•A "Don't remind me again" button
•Minimize button
•An install shield feature that allows Wife 2.0 to be installed with the option to uninstall at any time without the loss of cache and other system resources.
•An option to run the network driver in promiscuous mode which would allow the systems hardware probe feature to be much more useful.
I myself decided to avoid all of the headaches associated with Wife 1.0 by sticking with Girlfriend 2.0. Even here, however, I found many problems. Apparently you cannot install Girlfriend 2.0 on top of Girlfriend 1.0. You must uninstall Girlfriend 1.0 first. Other users say this is a long standing bug which I should have been aware of. Apparently the versions of Girlfriend have conflicts over shared use of the I/O port. You think they would have fixed such a stupid bug by now. To make matters worse, the uninstall program for Girlfriend 1.0 doesn't work very well leaving undesirable traces of the application in the system. Another thing that sucks -- all versions of Girlfriend continually pop-up little annoying messages about the advantages of upgrading to Wife 1.0

BUG WARNING

Wife 1.0 has an undocumented bug. If you try to install Mistress 1.1 before uninstalling Wife 1.0, Wife 1.0 will delete MSMoney files before doing the uninstall itself. Then Mistress 1.1 will refuse to install, claiming insufficient resources.

BUG WORK-AROUNDS

To avoid the above bug, try installing Mistress 1.1 on a different system and never run any file transfer applications such as LapLink 6.0. Also, beware of similar shareware applications that have been known to carry viruses that may affect Wife 1.0.

Another solution would be to run Mistress 1.0 via a UseNet provider under an anonymous name. Here again, beware of the viruses which can accidentally be downloaded from the UseNet.
Logged
Coding for the love of it!

headkaze

  • Administrator
  • Blue Gene Super Computer
  • **********
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7833
Re: I just though this was funny!
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2008, 11:34:33 PM »

I like the one with the programmer :D
Logged

Tempest

  • Jupiter Ace
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 31
Re: I just though this was funny!
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2008, 10:01:54 AM »

Good ones Flash!  :)
Logged

Grapple

  • Dragon 32
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 60
Re: I just though this was funny!
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2008, 05:56:58 AM »

Haha, mm all of them very funny...
Logged
Once you cut people open you realise we are pretty much the same.....

Flash

  • Administrator
  • Blue Gene Super Computer
  • **********
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13176
Re: I just though this was funny!
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2010, 08:17:47 PM »

A salesman  drove into a small town where a circus was in progress.
A sign  read: 'Don't Miss Derek The Amazing Scotsman'. The salesman bought a  ticket and sat down.
There,  on centre stage, was a table with three walnuts on it.
Standing  next to it was an old Scotsman.
Suddenly  the old man lifted his kilt, whipped out a huge willy and smashed all three walnuts with three mighty swings!

The  crowd erupted in applause as the elderly Scot was carried off on the  shoulders of the crowd.

Ten  years later the salesman visited the same little town and saw a faded sign  for the same circus and
the same sign 'Don't Miss Derek The Amazing Scotsman'.
He couldn’t believe the old guy was still alive, much less still doing his act!
He  bought a ticket. Again, the centre ring was illuminated.

This  time, however, instead of walnuts, three coconuts were placed on the table.
The  Scotsman stood before them, then suddenly lifted his kilt and shattered  the  coconuts with three swings of his amazing member.
The  crowd went wild!
Flabbergasted, the salesman requested a meeting with him after the show.

'You're  incredible!' he told the Scotsman. 'But I have to know
something.  You're older now, why switch from walnuts to coconuts?'

'Well laddie,' said the Scot, 'Ma eyes are nae whit they used tae be.'
Logged
Coding for the love of it!